![]() Indeed, CDs are read sequentially and so there may be reading errors while playing one, whereas FLAC does not suffer from this issue, so if anything, at least theoretically FLAC could sound "better" than CD. (A FLAC file can also be of much higher quality than a CD, just depends on the data.) That is just a fact, it's not open to "opinion". A FLAC ripped correctly from a CD is 100% exactly the same data as is on the CD, so it is 100% the exact "quality". That's not a question of FLAC vs CDs though, but of the equipment you use to play back. I've been burnt by iTunes in the past with its tendency to delete stuff from my hard drive without my permission. I use Neutron player on my smartphone to listen to music. Doesn't help me though as I only use iTunes to rip CDs to ALAC. Gapless is not supported when you burn a MP3 music disc.Īh, okay. Gapless is supported if you burn a MP3 playlist as a CD music disc. To my knowledge the MP3 format does not allow gapless playback, regardless of playback device / software, whereas AAC does support gapless playback.Īll my playlists are MP3's and there's no gaps (silence between tracks) when played in iTunes. so I can use the wonderful Roon software Wiki said FLAC has much detail as cd if choosen correctly, personally I think not. Personally i'm old-school I got nothing against FLAC but its not full audio-phile is it listening to music on computer no matter how good it is has tinny-depth, I know this set-up doesn't work on my hi-fi that tells me that cd has better sound quality. General Discussion: I am finally transferring my collection to FLAC. With the same name as one huge album, after all you could haveġ0 Greatest Hits albums.FSM Board: I am finally transferring my collection to FLAC. Surprising how simple things are wrong, such collating albums When comparing to other UPnP servers, it is Instances, each with different audio libraries
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |